Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1

[Pekka Enberg]

Hi Alexander,

On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:51 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> And if you need to share code with perf, then that just proves the
> point that perf doesn't belong inside the kernel tree either.

You seem to want to prove something here but our reasoning is based on
experience and practicalities - not some theoretical idea what should
and what shouldn't be in the Linux kernel tree. I really don't think
that perf would have turned out to be as useful as it is if it was
developed out-of-the-tree. That's also why we think tools/kvm is such a
good idea.

			Pekka

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/