Re: [PATCH] uio/gen-pci: don't enable interrupts in ISR

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Date: Thu Aug 04 2011 - 17:04:46 EST


On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 10:46:06PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> As reported by Anthony in a short way:
>
> |irq 17 handler uio_interrupt+0x0/0x68 enabled interrupts
> |NIP [c0069d84] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x260/0x26c
>
> The problem here is that spin_unlock_irq() enables the interrupts which
> is a no-no in interrupt context because they always run with interrupts
> disabled. This is the case even if IRQF_DISABLED has not been specified
> since v2.6.35. Therefore this patch uses simple spin_locks().
>
> Looking at it further here is only one spot where the lock is hold. So
> giving the fact that an ISR is not reentrant and is not executed on two
> cpus at the same time why do we need a lock here?

I'm not sure anymore. I think the idea was to use
it for synchronization down the road somehow,
but it never materialized. Let's drop that lock completely.

> The driver lacks of ->irqcontrol function so I guess the interrupt is
> enabled via direct PCI-access in userland.

Through sysfs.

> So there is _no_ protection
> against read-modify-write of user vs kernel so even that
> pci_block_user_cfg_access() is kinda pointless.

I didn't get that. pci_block_user_cfg_access is to prevent
sysfs access while we read modify-write the command register.
Isn't it effective for that?

> pci_block_user_cfg_access() in open() + ->irqcontrol() should fix this.

Why block in open? We don't access the device there, do we?

> Since changes the API of this driver I leave it up to the relevant users
> what to do.

Yes, changing API's not good, we need to keep existing userspace happy.

> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> # .35 and later
> Reported-and-Tested-by: Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c b/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> index fc22e1e..5c82681 100644
> --- a/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> +++ b/drivers/uio/uio_pci_generic.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static irqreturn_t irqhandler(int irq, struct uio_info *info)
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PCI_COMMAND % 4);
> BUILD_BUG_ON(PCI_COMMAND + 2 != PCI_STATUS);
>
> - spin_lock_irq(&gdev->lock);
> + spin_lock(&gdev->lock);
> pci_block_user_cfg_access(pdev);
>
> /* Read both command and status registers in a single 32-bit operation.
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static irqreturn_t irqhandler(int irq, struct uio_info *info)
> done:
>
> pci_unblock_user_cfg_access(pdev);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&gdev->lock);
> + spin_unlock(&gdev->lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/