Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec+kdump: reset PVdevices in kexec or crash kernel

From: Ian Campbell
Date: Tue Aug 09 2011 - 07:26:39 EST


On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 10:44 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> > > static int frontend_probe_and_watch(struct notifier_block *notifier,
> > > unsigned long event,
> > > void *data)
> > > {
> > > + /* reset devices in Connected or Closed state */
> > > + if (xen_hvm_domain())
> > && reset_devices ??
>
> No, reset_devices is passed as kernel cmdline option to a kdump boot.
> But its not part of a kexec boot.
>
> > How long should we wait for the backend to respond? Should we add a
> > timeout and countdown similar to wait_for_devices?
>
> Adding a timeout to catch a confused backend is a good idea. That would
> give one at least a chance to poke around in a rescue shell.
>
> > It's unfortunate that this code is effectively serialising on each
> > device. It would be much preferable to kick off all the resets and then
> > wait for them to occur. You could probably do this by incrementing a
> > counter for each device you reset and decrementing it each time a watch
> > triggers then wait for the counter to hit zero.
>
> That feature needs more thought. Since xenbus_reset_state() is only
> executed in the kexec/kdump case, the average use case is not slowed
> down.

I was thinking more of avoiding slowing down the kexec/kdump case
unnecessarily.

Ian.
>
> Olaf


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/