Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add Internal-reference-ID: patch tag

[H. Peter Anvin]

Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 11:09:56 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> On 07/31/2011 11:07 AM, Mike Waychison wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Internal-reference-ID: rdunlap.2011.0729.id1
>> >>>
>> > 
>> > Acked-by: Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > 
>> 
>> Just to avoid namespace collisions, can we at least put the owner
>> somewhere standardized, e.g. <2011.0729.id1@rdunlap>, <33999@google>
>and
>> so on?
>
>I would prefer to leave the text contents as unspecified, but I
>wouldn't
>mind recommending that users try to make them unique, e.g., by using
>a company-ID or owner-ID.  Would that be acceptable?
>
>
>---
>~Randy
>*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your
>code ***

No, that wouldn't work when there is more than one tag from different users.  And yes, I fully expect to see that.
-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse my brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/