Re: [BUG] Linux 3.0 commit 3627924acf70a brokeinclude/mtd/ubi_user.h.

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 06:39 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 14:16 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On 08/14/2011 01:03 PM, Stefan Richter wrote:
> > > On Aug 14 Rob Landley wrote:
> > >> "make headers_install" copies include/mtd/ubi_user.h to userspace, where
> > >> things like busybox link against it.  With 3.0, building defconfig
> > >> busybox gets this error:
> > >>
> > >> In file included from miscutils/ubi_tools.c:63:
> > >> /home/landley/aboriginal/aboriginal/build/simple-cross-compiler-i686/bin/../include/mtd/ubi-user.h:329:
> > >> error: conflicting types for '__packed'
> > >> /home/landley/aboriginal/aboriginal/build/simple-cross-compiler-i686/bin/../include/mtd/ubi-user.h:313:
> > >> error: previous declaration of '__packed' was here
> > >>
> > >> This is due to the Linux 3.0 commit in the title:
> > >>
> > >>     UBI: use __packed instead of __attribute__((packed))
> > >>
> > >> This relies on __packed being defined in:
> > >>
> > >>   include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:
> > >>   #define __packed			__attribute__((packed))
> > >>
> > >> Which is not exported to userspace.
> > >>
> > >> I.E. this "cleanup" broke the ability for userspace to use this header,
> > >> even though the header is exported to userspace by headers_install.
> > > 
> > > As far as I can tell, the __packed or __attribute__((packed))
> > > qualifications are superfluous in include/mtd/ubi-user.h anyway.
> > 
> > And Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> (the other listed UBI
> > maintainer) also bounces.  Did the developer exodus after Nokia decided
> > to cozy up to The Black Widow take 'em both out?
> 
> Yes, both of us have left Nokia recently. Adrian should fix the
> "MAINTAINERS" file.
> 
> WRT to the breakage - yes, it was my mistake to follow the new trend in
> the Linux kernel - the commit message has a reference to the other
> commit which inspired the check, and you can find out that some other
> projects made a similar change. Moreover, checkpatch.pl prints the
> following warning "WARN("__packed is preferred over
> __attribute__((packed))". So you hardly can blame :-)
> 
> Anyways, this problem was discussed in the "__packed vs.
> __attribute__((packed)) in kernel headers" thread in LKML.
> 
> Then a fix has been sent, see the "{PATCH] fix __packed in exported
> kernel headers" thread in LKML. This fix was accepted by "Michal Marek
> <mmarek@xxxxxxx>", whom I put to CC.

And the fix is upstream, see:

commit f210735fe2f17a6225432ee3d1239bcf23a8659c
Author: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jun 24 15:51:00 2011 +0200

Probably someone can ping the -stable team and ask them to take it to
linux-3.0-stable?

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐ)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/