Re: [PATCH 3/5] writeback: dirty rate control

[Wu Fengguang]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:10:26AM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 22:00 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > 
> > > Although I'm not quite sure how he keeps fairness in light of the
> > > sleep time bounding to MAX_PAUSE.
> > 
> > Firstly, MAX_PAUSE will only be applied when the dirty pages rush
> > high (dirty exceeded).  Secondly, the dirty exceeded state is global
> > to all tasks, in which case each task will sleep for MAX_PAUSE equally.
> > So the fairness is still maintained in dirty exceeded state. 
> 
> Its not immediately apparent how dirty_exceeded and MAX_PAUSE interact,
> but having everybody sleep MAX_PAUSE doesn't necessarily mean its fair,
> its only fair if they dirty at the same rate.

Yeah I forget to mention that, but when dirty_exceeded, the tasks will
typically sleep for MAX_PAUSE on every 8 pages, so resulting in the
same dirty rate :)

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/