Re: [PATCH 6/9] Staging: Winbond: Remove spacing issues related to pointers.

From: Pekka Enberg
Date: Tue Aug 16 2011 - 01:45:25 EST


On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 3:24 AM, Akshay Joshi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch ensures that spacing around pointers is consistent and
> follows the kernel coding style.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Joshi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_f.h |    4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_s.h |    4 ++--
>  drivers/staging/winbond/wb35tx_s.h |    4 ++--
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_f.h b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_f.h
> index 4efc790..8f51136 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_f.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_f.h
> @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
>  * Interface function declare
>  */
>  unsigned char          Wb35Rx_initial(struct hw_data *pHwData);
> -void           Wb35Rx_destroy(struct hw_data * pHwData);
> -void           Wb35Rx_stop(struct hw_data * pHwData);
> +void           Wb35Rx_destroy(struct hw_data *pHwData);
> +void           Wb35Rx_stop(struct hw_data *pHwData);
>  void           Wb35Rx_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
>
>  #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_s.h b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_s.h
> index 949e4f5..e99475db 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_s.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35rx_s.h
> @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ struct wb35_rx {
>        u32     Rx3UrbCancel;
>
>        u32     LastR1; /* For RSSI reporting */
> -       struct urb *                            RxUrb;
> +       struct urb *RxUrb;
>        u32             Ep3ErrorCount2; /* 20060625.1 Usbd for Rx DMA error count */
>
>        int             EP3VM_status;
> -       u8 *    pDRx;
> +       u8 *pDRx;
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35tx_s.h b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35tx_s.h
> index 83b4b0f..fda18d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35tx_s.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/winbond/wb35tx_s.h
> @@ -31,8 +31,8 @@ struct wb35_tx {
>        u32         EP4vm_state; /* for EP4vm state */
>        u32         tx_halt; /* Stopping VM */
>
> -       struct urb *                            Tx4Urb;
> -       struct urb *                            Tx2Urb;
> +       struct urb *Tx4Urb;
> +       struct urb *Tx2Urb;
>
>        int             EP2VM_status;
>        int             EP4VM_status;

If you're doing this, can you please then fix up all the struct
members to be consistent? I personally prefer the perf and x86 style
where you align members like this (with tabs):

u32 EP4vm_state;
u32 tx_halt;
struct urb *Tx4Urb;

etc...

Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/