Re: warning:âx86_get_event_constraintsâ defined butnot used

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 20:40 -0300, Kevin Winchester wrote:
> Is there are reason why those C
> files are included directly in another C file rather than being linked
> together?  

Sheer suckyness on my part.. we needed a 'quick' fix to make these
CPU_SUP_* things build at all and never got around to cleaning it up
afterwards.

> Or is there some other way the code could be improved and
> also remove the warning at the same time?

creation of a arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h and enough code massage
to make all these .c files compile independently would be appreciated,
not sure that'll immediately solve your issue though.

> I do not mind doing some coding here to make this happen.  I am very
> close to a warning-free build, so I would definitely like to take care
> of this one.

You could slip something like it into the 'cleanup' if nothing else
presents itself :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/