Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the mfd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Rafael,

On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:16:33 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, August 23, 2011, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/mfd/twl4030-irq.c between commit 99efe0d4c992 ("mfd: Drop the
> > twl4030-irq kthread") from the mfd tree and commit febab68efa45
> > ("freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly") from the pm
> > tree.
> > 
> > The former dropped the code modified by the latter, so I did that.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't think we can really fix that other that making
> one tree depend on the other.

We can just leave it for Linus to fix up during the next merge window.
After all, I figured it out.  :-)

("git rerere" takes care of fixing it up for me from now on)
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature