Re: [PATCH] fix the outdated comment in ext2_nfs_get_inode()

[Jan Kara]

On Tue 30-08-11 17:53:58, Li Haifeng wrote:
> The function iget  referred by the comment is replaced by ext2_iget .
> And the ext2_read_inode() is not exist, the ext2_iget is "neater". So
> the comment is fixed here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Haifeng <omycle@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext2/super.c |    6 ++----
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
> index 1dd62ed..994ced3 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
> @@ -327,10 +327,8 @@ static struct inode *ext2_nfs_get_inode(struct
> super_block *sb,
>     if (ino > le32_to_cpu(EXT2_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count))
>         return ERR_PTR(-ESTALE);
> 
> -   /* iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!!
> -    * ext2_read_inode currently does appropriate checks, but
> -    * it might be "neater" to call ext2_get_inode first and check
> -    * if the inode is valid.....
> +   /*
> +    * ext2_iget isn't really right if the inode is currently unallocated!!
  OK, but we should keep there a note that ext2_iget() does appropriate
checks to handle stale inodes.

									Honza
>      */
>     inode = ext2_iget(sb, ino);
>     if (IS_ERR(inode))
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/