Re: [RFC PATCH 00/32] Nohz cpusets (was: Nohz Tasks)

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Aug 31 2011 - 06:34:20 EST


On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 12:26 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 11:28 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 05:47 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 16:06 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ah I haven't tested with that isolcpus especially as it's headed toward
> > > > removal.
> > >
> > > It is? Is it being replaced by something? (I find it useful)
> >
> > cpusets? Afaict all it does is not include a number of cpus in the sched
> > domains, creating a bunch of independent scheduling cpus. You can use
> > cpusets to get to the same state.
>
> Guess I'll have to try creating a cpuset per cpu, and see how it
> compares to isolcpus. cset shield --cpu 4-63 didn't work well enough.

You need to play with the sched_load_balance file, no idea what this
cset utility is though, never encountered it before.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/