Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: zcache: xcfmalloc memory allocator forzcache

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 10:43:27AM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On 08/31/2011 09:40 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
> 
> > +static struct xcf_blkdesc *xcf_find_remove_block(struct xcf_pool *pool,
> > +	int size, int blocknum)
> > +{
> > +	int flindex, i;
> > +	struct xcf_blkdesc *desc = NULL;
> > +
> > +	flindex = xcf_size_to_flindex(size + sizeof(struct xcf_blkhdr));
> > +
> > +	/* look for best fit */
> > +	if (pool->freelists[flindex])
> > +		goto remove;
> > +
> > +	/* if this is the last block allowed in the allocation, we shouldn't
> > +	 * consider smaller blocks.  it's all or nothing now */
> > +	if (blocknum == XCF_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_ALLOC) {
> 
> In gathering my performance numbers for Dan, I discovered I introduced
> a regression by making a late change in my development.
> 
> This line should be:
> 	if (blocknum != XCF_MAX_BLOCKS_PER_ALLOC) {
> 
> This regression actually causes xcfmalloc to have the same fragmentation
> issue as xvmalloc.

Ok, care to resend a tested and correct patch series then?

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/