Re: [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 09/07/2011 06:30 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
> Could you name this as NBD_SET_FLAGS, as that's more consistent with
> what it's really doing?

I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not 
use the flags field from the network protocol as is.  Also, "features" 
sounds more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" 
should probably cause a failure.

What about renaming the struct field and leaving this as 
NBD_SET_FEATURES or NBD_ENABLE_FEATURES?

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/