Re: [PATCH] perf: make perf.data more self-descriptive (v3)

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 14:55 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 22:46 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >> +static const char *topo_fmt[] = {
> >> +       "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/topology/core_siblings_list",
> >> +       "/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu%d/topology/thread_siblings_list",
> >> +       NULL
> >> +};
> >
> > No nodes?
> >
> To record what information? core/thread siblings or memory stuff?

Dunno really,.. but nodes are part of the topology and with people
interested in all this uncore business it might make sense to have that.
Maybe even record the node-distance table so you can reconstruct the
interconnect topology.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/