Re: [PATCH v3] Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in'data'

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 09/08, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter

Thanks, looks good. But we need the correct "Simplify PTRACE_foo..."
first.

> Make it possible to extend SEIZE in the future with more functionality
> by passing non-zero 'addr' parameter.

Agreed, this makes sense.

> Set all task->ptrace bits in one operation - before this change,
> we were adding PT_SEIZED and PT_PTRACE_CAP with task->ptrace |= BIT ops.
> This was probably ok (not a bug), but let's be on a safer side.

PT_PTRACE_CAP is fine, but PT_SEIZED is not really, afaics.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/