Re: [patch v3 19/36] Hexagon: Add ptrace support

[Linas Vepstas (Code Aurora)]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:15:20PM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> 
> That said, I don't think gdbserver has been updated to use
> GETREGSET/SETREGSET.  This is a bit like the uClibc/glibc issue,

Some dumb questions then: I notice that a few arches declare
struct user_regs_struct in glibc, most of the others in the
kernel.  If I were to make pt_regs completely kernel-private,
then I really do need to have struct user_regs_struct declared
the kernel headers, right? 

Putting a printk into case PTRACE_POKEUSR seemed to show that
gdb was using this (and was somehow mis-numbering the registers
... sigh.) Are you saying that the default should handle this?

--linas

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/