Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/mm/numa.c: quiet sparse noise when CONFIG_X86_64is not set

[David Rientjes]

On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> index fbeaaf4..11c60a7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,7 @@ void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance)
>  	numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to] = distance;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  int __node_distance(int from, int to)
>  {
>  	if (from >= numa_distance_cnt || to >= numa_distance_cnt)
> @@ -462,6 +463,7 @@ int __node_distance(int from, int to)
>  	return numa_distance[from * numa_distance_cnt + to];
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
> +#endif
>  
>  /*
>   * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly
> 

What is 64-bit specific about this function?  Shouldn't we be defining it 
to be node_distance for all of x86?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/