Re: [PATCH 8/5] llist: Remove cpu_relax() usage in cmpxchg loops

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 17:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> Furthermore, I would argue we should avoid growing them, significantly
> contended atomic ops are bad, use a different scheme.

To clarify, plain cmpxchg loops are unfair and unbounded in completion
time, and we should therefore avoid any sort of medium/high contention.
If you get into that situation you're doing it wrong.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/