Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the tip tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi,

On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:54:41 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:12:33 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On 08/25/2011 04:06 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Stephen: the x86/spinlocks branch in the -tip tree is obsolete and
> > >> should be dropped.
> > > 
> > > That's a bit tricky as I get a rolled up tip tree.  The best I could do
> > > is revert the commit that merges the x86/spinlocks branch into
> > > auto-latest ...  I'll do that for today (unless something happens to the
> > > tip tree in the next hour).
> > > 
> > 
> > OK, let me bother Ingo about it.
> 
> For today, I have done "git revert -m 1 6f8fa39c81f1" after merging the
> tip tree.

I am still doing this in each linux-next, and it doesn't appear to have
been fixed up the the tree on tesla.tglx.de, yet, I think.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature