Re: [PATCH 1/9] Remove parent field in cpuacct cgroup

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 13:41 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 09/19/2011 01:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 13:30 -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> >> Since this value is at least intended to
> >> provide a basis for cpu capping in the near future (Well, it is not
> >> there, but I think it is), it is expected to be used much more
> >> frequently by the kernel itself.
> >
> > We just merged a bandwidth limiter quite separate from cpuacct.
> 
> Note I was talking about cpuusage. Well, in this case, I myself fail
> to see the value of the whole cpuusage thing... Someone that sees 
> further could maybe help us out here? (but this is sideways to the whole 
> discussion we're having anyway)

Would probably do to cc the cpuacct authors in this patch set ;-) I
think it came from IBM, so I added vatsa.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/