Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] lib: add unpack_hex_byte()

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:35:08 -0400
Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Wouldn't it be better to fix hex2bin() so that it returns -1 on error?
> 
> Yes, that was the original idea, but in order to return a result, it
> needs to validate the input.  The above code, or something similar,
> needs to exist somewhere, either in the new function or in hex2bin().
> Would something like this be any better?
> 
> int hex2bin(u8 *dst, const char *src, size_t count)
> {
> 	while (count--) {
>                 int hi = hex_to_bin(*src++);
>                 int lo = hex_to_bin(*src++);
> 
>                 if ((hi < 0) || (lo < 0))
>                         return -1;
> 
>                 *dst++ = (hi << 4) | lo;
>         }
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> 
> > Then the above function becomes a one-liner:
> > 
> > 	return hex2bin(dst, src, 2);
> 
> Why bother?  With something like this, there isn't a need for the new
> function.  :-)

OK.

> > Finally, the name is poor.  It starts with "unpack_", so it belongs to
> > the "unpack" subsystem.  There's no such thing.  Something like
> > hex_byte_to_bin() would be better.
> 
> agreed.  It was suppose to parallel the existing pack_hex_byte().

hex_byte_pack() :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/