Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/5] printk: Have wake_up_klogd() use__this_cpu_write()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Sep 20 2011 - 10:56:21 EST
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 09:54 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Note, just because something is always in a location that preemption is
> > disabled, does not mean it should use the __this_cpu*() variants.
>
> Why not? If preemption is disabled then the process cannot be migrated to
> another processor. And thus doing the address calculations and operations
> on variables step by step is okay.
>
> > Because if things change, it may become a problem later on.
>
> What things may change? Someone calls the function with preemption
> enabled?
Yes, also, for !x86 you get a redundant preempt_disable/enable pair.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/