Re: [PATCH 21/21] tracing: Add optional percpu buffers fortrace_printk()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Fri Sep 23 2011 - 07:02:33 EST


On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:09 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Currently, trace_printk() uses a single buffer to write into
> to calculate the size and format needed to save the trace. To
> do this safely in an SMP environment, a spin_lock() is taken
> to only allow one writer at a time to the buffer. But this could
> also affect what is being traced, and add synchronization that
> would not be there otherwise.

so trace_printk() isn't NMI safe? #$%@^%@@$%@
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/