Re: [PATCH] fix find_next_system_ram comments

[Randy Dunlap]

On 09/26/2011 06:58 AM, Wizard wrote:
> The purpose of find_next_system_ram() is to find a the lowest
> memory resource which contain or overlap the [res->start, res->end),
> not just contain.
> 
> In this patch, I make this comment more exact and fix one typo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wizard <wizarddewhite@xxxxxxxxx>

For Signed-off-by: Documentation/SubmittingPatches says:

using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)

> ---
>  kernel/resource.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
> index 3b3cedc..2751a8c 100644
> --- a/kernel/resource.c
> +++ b/kernel/resource.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(release_resource);
>  
>  #if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_WALK_MEMORY)
>  /*
> - * Finds the lowest memory reosurce exists within [res->start.res->end)
> + * Finds the lowest memory resource which contains or overlaps
> + * [res->start.res->end)

Your patch description uses ", " (comma) here.  I think that's better than
keeping the ".".

>   * the caller must specify res->start, res->end, res->flags and "name".
>   * If found, returns 0, res is overwritten, if not found, returns -1.
>   */


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/