Re: [159/244] ipc/mqueue.c: fix mq_open() return value

[Doug Ledford]

----- Original Message -----
> Um, that's the way this patch is upstream, right?  So perhaps it
> should
> be fixed there first and then I can take the fix into -stable?

Upstream is a bit of a fuzzy statement ;-)  It might be in -next, but it's not in Linus' tree or Andrew's -mm tree or else my recent patches would have conflicted.  And in fact, upon further reflection, I think maybe that particular test could use being split into two distinct tests.  One for wrapping the byte counter, which would return -ENOMEM, and one for exceeding RLIMIT_MSGQUEUE which would return -EPERM (not sure if that's right, I would have to poke around elsewhere, but it seems a better response when you are violating a ulimit than nomem to me anyway).

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
              GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
	      http://people.redhat.com/dledford

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/