[PATCH 1/2] cgroup/kmemleak: Annotate alloc_page() for cgroupallocations

From: Jonathan Nieder
Date: Thu Sep 29 2011 - 21:48:37 EST


From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:19:16 -0400

When the cgroup base was allocated with kmalloc, it was necessary to
annotate the variable with kmemleak_not_leak(). But because it has
recently been changed to be allocated with alloc_page() (which skips
kmemleak checks) causes a warning on boot up.

I was triggering this output:

allocated 8388608 bytes of page_cgroup
please try 'cgroup_disable=memory' option if you don't want memory cgroups
kmemleak: Trying to color unknown object at 0xf5840000 as Grey
Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.0.0-test #12
Call Trace:
[<c17e34e6>] ? printk+0x1d/0x1f^M
[<c10e2941>] paint_ptr+0x4f/0x78
[<c178ab57>] kmemleak_not_leak+0x58/0x7d
[<c108ae9f>] ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x9/0x7d
[<c1cdb462>] kmemleak_init+0x19d/0x1e9
[<c1cbf771>] start_kernel+0x346/0x3ec
[<c1cbf1b4>] ? loglevel+0x18/0x18
[<c1cbf0aa>] i386_start_kernel+0xaa/0xb0

After a bit of debugging I tracked the object 0xf840000 (and others)
down to the cgroup code. The change from allocating base with kmalloc to
alloc_page() has the base not calling kmemleak_alloc() which adds the
pointer to the object_tree_root, but kmemleak_not_leak() adds it to the
crt_early_log[] table. On kmemleak_init(), the entry is found in the
early_log[] but not the object_tree_root, and this error message is
displayed.

If alloc_page() fails then it defaults back to vmalloc() which still
uses the kmemleak_alloc() which makes us still need the
kmemleak_not_leak() call. The solution is to call the kmemleak_alloc()
directly if the alloc_page() succeeds.

Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is taken from [1]. The only change I made is to correct
"kmemcheck" above to "kmemleak" as suggested by Catalin. Seems to
work ok. :)

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1171696/focus=1178619

mm/page_cgroup.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_cgroup.c b/mm/page_cgroup.c
index 39d216d535ea..95e564cfe788 100644
--- a/mm/page_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/page_cgroup.c
@@ -133,10 +133,13 @@ struct page *lookup_cgroup_page(struct page_cgroup *pc)
static void *__meminit alloc_page_cgroup(size_t size, int nid)
{
void *addr = NULL;
+ gfp_t flags = GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN;

- addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
- if (addr)
+ addr = alloc_pages_exact_nid(nid, size, flags);
+ if (addr) {
+ kmemleak_alloc(addr, size, 1, flags);
return addr;
+ }

if (node_state(nid, N_HIGH_MEMORY))
addr = vmalloc_node(size, nid);
--
1.7.7.rc1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/