Re: [BUGFIX] cgroup: create a workqueue for cgroup

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Sep 30 2011 - 18:31:08 EST


On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:54:52 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In commit:f90d4118, cpuset_wq, a separate workqueue for cpuset, was introduced
> to avoid a dead lock against cgroup_mutex between async_rebuild_sched_domains()
> and cgroup_tasks_write().
>
> But check_for_release() has a similar problem:
>
> check_for_release()
> schedule_work(release_agent_work)
> cgroup_release_agent()
> mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex)
>
> And I actually see a lockup which seems to be caused by this problem
> on 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.x86_64.

Are you sure the bug is still present in current kernels? Perhaps
Tejun's workqueue changes magically made it go away.

>
> ...
> --- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ struct css_id;
>
> extern int cgroup_init_early(void);
> extern int cgroup_init(void);
> +extern void cgroup_wq_init(void);
> +extern void queue_cgroup_work(struct work_struct *work);
> extern void cgroup_lock(void);
> extern int cgroup_lock_is_held(void);
> extern bool cgroup_lock_live_group(struct cgroup *cgrp);

Can we spot the odd man out?

I shall rename queue_cgroup_work() to cgroup_queue_work().

>
> ...
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/