Re: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32
From: Willy Tarreau
Date: Sat Oct 01 2011 - 14:41:06 EST
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 02:16:05PM -0400, starlight@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> At 08:44 AM 10/1/2011 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >In my experience, I have the exact opposite :
> >performance greatly improved in recent
> >kernels. Unless you compile your kernel to include
> >new features that might reduce performance
> >(namespaces, cgroup, ...)
> RH has both of the above turned on in the
> 2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64 kernel tested.
> If these are big negatives to network
> performance, could you list what should
> specifically turned off to maximize
> results? Also a recommendation for
> the best recent kernel for another
> benchmark would be helpful.
> Probably can't convince anyone to deploy a
> kernel without commercial support, but if
> an alternate compile fixes performance it
> might be possible to convince RH to support
> the alternative build.
Just a suggestion, instead of measuring CPU usage at a
given load, could you check what maximal load you can
achieve ? It is very possible that CPU usage report is
not accurate. We observed this in a number of situations,
especially in high packet rate environments where the
usage is a sum of many micro-measurements.
Also, I did not notice any indication on the load level
you were reaching (packets per second and bandwidth).
Have you compared the interrupt rate ? It is possible
that they differ between the two kernels, for instance
because the NIC auto-adapts instead of being throttled
to a given rate. This can have a significant impact on
measurements and performance.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/