Re: kernel.org status: establishing a PGP web of trust
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Oct 02 2011 - 07:52:53 EST
On Sunday, October 02, 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/01/2011 06:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > OK, I'm taking this as "5 years is fine by us". :-)
> > And the recommended procedure for rotating keys seems to be (1) generate
> > a new key and (2) make as many people as you can sign it before the old
> > one expires, right?
> (3) revoke the old key with a status code of "no longer in use", or just
> let it expire.
> >> Some people have decided to opt for an unlimited key, but that
> >> *requires* that you have a way to revoke the old key, which is why we
> >> are considering a key revocation escrow service.
> > That service will be necessary anyway in case some keys are lost or
> > compromised.
> > I wonder what the procedure of restoring kernel.org access in case one
> > has lost keys is supposed to be?
> Get a new key and get it re-signed.
Hmm. That doesn't seem very practical if someone doesn't live close
to any other core kernel developers.
What number of signatures on the key will be regarded as sufficient?
> We can work out specific details at KS.
Well, the KS is going to be busy time this year I suppose. :-)
What about people who haven't been invited to the KS?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/