Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a generic clock infrastructure
From: Mark Brown
Date: Mon Oct 03 2011 - 13:05:19 EST
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:31:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
[Not being many off-SoC clocks]
> > I dunno, I get the impression that some of this is due to the current
> > limitations of the clock API rather than due to a lack of clocks -
> > perhaps that's specific to the applications I look at, though.
> > applications
> The clk API per-se has nothing to do with how clocks are registered.
> There are two things that are the clk API:
Right, it's consumer side only which is the limitation I'm talking about
- at the minute it's only possible to use the clk API for on-SoC clocks
(or at least clocks that the SoC cares about), we don't have a clock API
for cross platform clock providers. I don't know if getting a cross
platform implementation will change that situation much.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/