Re: [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:06:13AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:04:53AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>...
> >> of a bug in that the new code doesn't report si_addr properly, but
> >> that sounds unlikely as a culprit. ÂDid you try with the offending
> >> commit reverted (i.e. fce8dc0)? ÂI bet that it also fails there.
> >
> > fce8dc0 is "x86-64: Wire up getcpu syscall", is that really the one you
> > want me to revert?
> 
> No -- I actually meant to try running that revision or to try with the
> vsyscall= patch reverted.

I now tried both, and your bet was right.

>...
> --Andy

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/