Re: [3.1 patch] x86: default to vsyscall=native
From: Adrian Bunk
Date: Mon Oct 03 2011 - 14:41:15 EST
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 11:06:13AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:04:53AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >> of a bug in that the new code doesn't report si_addr properly, but
> >> that sounds unlikely as a culprit. ÂDid you try with the offending
> >> commit reverted (i.e. fce8dc0)? ÂI bet that it also fails there.
> > fce8dc0 is "x86-64: Wire up getcpu syscall", is that really the one you
> > want me to revert?
> No -- I actually meant to try running that revision or to try with the
> vsyscall= patch reverted.
I now tried both, and your bet was right.
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/