Re: [PATCH] ext3/xattr_seciruty.c: local functions should be static
From: Jan Kara
Date: Wed Oct 05 2011 - 16:18:19 EST
On Wed 05-10-11 12:27:06, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 4:38 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Fri 23-09-11 15:07:09, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> >> Quiets the sparse noise:
> >> warning: symbol 'ext3_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static?
> >> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Here applies the same comment as to the ext2 patch - not in current
> > Linus' kernel AFAICS.
> These are in linux-next due to:
> commit 9d8f13ba3f4833219e50767b022b82cd0da930eb
> Author: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon Jun 6 15:29:25 2011 -0400
> security: new security_inode_init_security API adds function callback
> I can repost these after this commit hits Linus' kernel if necessary.
I see. OK, please repost when they hit Linus' kernel since I guess it's
not urgent to merge these.
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/