Re: [PATCHv4] DMAEngine: Define interleaved transfer request api

From: Jassi Brar
Date: Fri Oct 07 2011 - 10:44:13 EST


On 7 October 2011 19:49, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 16:57 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:

>> > I would still argue that if we split this on same lines as current
>> > mechanism, we have clean way to convey all details for both cases.
>> >
>> Do you mean to have separate interleaved transfer apis for Slave
>> and Mem->Mem ? Please clarify.
> If we can make API cleaner and well defined that way then Yes :)
>
I assume if you suggest you already have an idea....
Please do tell roughly how the api should look for Slave and for Mem->Mem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/