Re: Linux 3.1-rc9

[Simon Kirby]

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times);
>  static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig)
>  {
>  	raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock);

My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*.

Which tree is your patch against? -next or something?

It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right?

> sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry
patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines).
patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
patching file kernel/sched_stats.h

Simon-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/