RE: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: util: Invoke cn_netlink_send() in awork context

From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Mon Oct 10 2011 - 10:10:17 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 7:44 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ohering@xxxxxxxx;
> Haiyang Zhang
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: util: Invoke cn_netlink_send() in a work
> context
>
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:42:28PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Invoke cn_netlink_send() in a work context as opposed being called
> > in the context of channel callback. On entry into the channel callback
> > code the channel inbound spin lock is held and deferring to a work
> > context avoids having to invoke cn_netlink_send() while holding
> > the inbound lock. As part of this adjustment, also increase the
> > timeout value for waiting for the user level component of KVP.
>
> As told a few times you really need to move away from the connector
> before sumitting the KVP support. What about tackling that instead of
> band aiding it?

Christoph, I am still not sure what the issues with the connector are that you mention.
When I was initially designing the KVP feature, we did have a discussion of what the kernel/
user-mode transport should be and the connector interface was the consensus then.
The changes in this patch, I would probably make no matter what the transport mechanism was;
nothing connector specific.

Regards,

K. Y




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/