Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/8] stop_machine: make stop_machine safe and efficientto call early

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

On 10/10/2011 12:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue,  4 Oct 2011 12:18:03 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Make stop_machine() safe to call early in boot, before stop_machine()
>>> has been set up, by simply calling the callback function directly if
>>> there's only one CPU online.
>> Not that you need this, since it's >90% Tejun's code now, but:
>>
>> Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> hey, extra review is always useful.
>
> Jeremy, Tejun, what's the expected merge path of these changes?

Andrew has already picked up the stop_machine patch, I think.  But it's
pretty settled now, so it shouldn't cause any problem if it gets via
multiple paths.

What about the jump-label stuff?  Has that been going via tip.git in the
past, or by some other path?

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/