Re: [PATCH] Code clean up for percpu_xxx() functions

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Alex,Shi wrote:

> I thought again of this_cpu_xxx function, yes, some of them are better
> to be replaced by __this_cpu__xxx if preemption is safe on the scenario.
> But this change is better to be done in another patch. I did not
> finished all changed function check today.  May try again in next week.
> What's you pinion of this?

I think its good to have it all in a single patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/