Re: [PATCH] mm: add a "struct page_frag" type containing a page,offset and length

From: Ian Campbell
Date: Fri Oct 14 2011 - 02:56:07 EST


On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 22:22 +0100, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Looks OK to me. I'm surprised we don't already have such a thing.
>
> Review comments:
>
>
> > +struct page_frag {
> > + struct page *page;
> > +#if (BITS_PER_LONG > 32) || (PAGE_SIZE >= 65536)
>
> It does add risk that people will add compile warnings and bugs by
> failing to consider or test the other case.
>
> We could reduce that risk by doing
>
> #if (PAGE_SIZE >= 65536)
>
> but then the 32-bit version would hardly ever be tested at all.

Indeed. The first variant has the benefit that most 32-bit arches will
test one case and most 64-bit ones the other.

Perhaps the need to keep this struct small is not so acute as it is for
the skb_frag_t I nicked it from and just using __u32 unconditionally is
sufficient?

>
> > + __u32 page_offset;
>
> I suggest this be called simply "offset".

ACK.

Thanks,

Ian.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/