Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/55] rcu: Add grace-period,quiescent-state, and call_rcu trace events

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:33:53PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:00:16AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Add trace events to record grace-period start and end, quiescent states,
> > CPUs noticing grace-period start and end, grace-period initialization,
> > call_rcu() invocation, tasks blocking in RCU read-side critical sections,
> > tasks exiting those same critical sections, force_quiescent_state()
> > detection of dyntick-idle and offline CPUs, CPUs entering and leaving
> > dyntick-idle mode (except from NMIs), CPUs coming online and going
> > offline, and CPUs being kicked for staying in dyntick-idle mode for too
> > long (as in many weeks, even on 32-bit systems).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > rcu: Add the rcu flavor to callback trace events
> > 
> > The earlier trace events for registering RCU callbacks and for invoking
> > them did not include the RCU flavor (rcu_bh, rcu_preempt, or rcu_sched).
> > This commit adds the RCU flavor to those trace events.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Did you intend for this commit message to contain two full commit
> messages, and three signoffs from you?

No, messed up a rebase.  <red face>

> Also, the subject doesn't seem to cover the second half of the commit
> message.

This is indeed the first set of trace events where the name of the RCU
flavor was important.

							Thanx, Paul

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/