Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] MIPS: Add board support for Loongson1B
From: Kelvin Cheung
Date: Mon Oct 24 2011 - 22:19:06 EST
2011/10/24, Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>:
> On 10/24/2011 4:05 PM, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
>> 2011/10/24, Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>:
>>> Hello Kelvin.
>>> On 10/24/2011 12:36 PM, Kelvin Cheung wrote:
>>>> According to datasheet of Loongson 1B, the buffer size in RX/TX
>>>> descriptor is only 2KB. So the Loongson1B's GMAC could not handle
>>>> jumbo frames. And the second buffer is useless in this case. Am I
>>>> right? Is there a better way than ifdef CONFIG_MACH_LOONGSON1 to
>>>> avoid duplicate code?
>>> Sorry for my misunderstanding.
>>> I think you have to use the normal descriptor and remove the enh_desc
>>> from the platform w/o modifying the driver at all.
>>> The driver will be able to select/configure all automatically (also
>>> Let me know.
>> That's the problem.
>> The bitfield definition of Loongson1B is also different from normal
> The problem is not in the Loongson1B gmac.
I found that the bit checksum_insertion is not existed in normal descriptor.
> The normal descriptor fields in the stmmac refer to an old synopsys
Could you send me the new databook of Synopsys GMAC?
> New chips have the same structure you have added; so we should fix this
> in the driver w/o breaking the compatibility for old chips.
> I kindly ask you to confirm if the currently normal descriptor structure
> (w/o your changes) doesn't work on your platform.
> Did you test it?
Well, the normal descriptor works on my platform except TX checksum offload.
>> Moreover, I want to enable the TX checksum offload function which is
>> not supported in normal descriptor.
>> Any suggestions?
> It is supported but you have to pass from the platform: tx_coe = 1.
I noticed that the flag csum_insertion is passed to
ndesc_prepare_tx_desc() in stmmac_xmit(). But ndesc_prepare_tx_desc()
just ignores it.
In other words, the TX checksum offload function is disabled in normal
Should we fix this problem for normal descriptor?
>>> IIRC, there is a bit difference in case of normal descriptors for
>>> Synopsys databook newer than the 1.91 (I used for testing this mode).
>>> In any case, I remember that, on some platforms, the normal descriptors
>>> have been used w/o problems also on these new chip generations.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/