Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM / Sleep: Extended control of suspend/hibernate interfaces
From: Valdis . Kletnieks
Date: Tue Oct 25 2011 - 03:47:37 EST
On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:52:44 +1100, NeilBrown said:
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:23:43 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Monday, October 24, 2011, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:16:36 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Similarly every system need one process to manage suspend. It can be my
> > > daemon or your daemon or Alan's daemon but it cannot be 2 or more of them
> > > running at the same time as that doesn't make any more sense than having
> > > systemd and init running at the same time.
> > I agree that it doesn't makes sense. I don't agree that it implies people
> > won't try to do that.
> Does that matter? If they complain, tell them it isn't a supported
We however *should* design things in such a way that if a second one is started
up, it tosses a nice obvious -EIDIOT error of some sort.
Description: PGP signature