Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (block ?)

[Sedat Dilek]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> *Note well*
>>
>> This tree has nate had any build testing at all. ÂAs such, it probably
>> doesn't build :-) This tree is really just a roll up of the current state
>> of the trees when the v3.2 merge window opened. ÂIt will not be put into
>> the build system referred to below.
>>
>
> I have generated a single linux-next (next-20111025) patch on top of
> v3.1, it's approx. 100M!
>
> $ du -h patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
> 96M Â Â patch-v3.1-next-20111025.patch
>
> I noticed this build-failure:
>
> ÂCC Â Â Âblock/blk-throttle.o
> ÂCC [M] Âfs/fuse/dir.o
> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:
> In function 'blk_throtl_drain':
> /mnt/sdb3/linux-kernel/linux-3.1/debian/build/source_i386_none/block/blk-throttle.c:1221:2:
> error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held'
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> make[5]: *** [block/blk-throttle.o] Error 1
> make[4]: *** [block] Error 2
>
> This happens with Debian's gcc-4.6 (4.6.1-16) and default
> KBUILD_ENABLE_EXTRA_GCC_CHECKS value.
>
> - Sedat -
>

Looks like "#include <linux/lockdep.h>" is missing in block/blk-throttle.c?

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/