Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] PM: Limit race conditions between runtime PM and system sleep (v2)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Thu Oct 27 2011 - 16:04:40 EST
On Thursday, October 27, 2011, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2011/6/29 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>:
> > One of the roles of the PM core is to prevent different PM callbacks
> > executed for the same device object from racing with each other.
> > Unfortunately, after commit e8665002477f0278f84f898145b1f141ba26ee26
> > (PM: Allow pm_runtime_suspend() to succeed during system suspend)
> > runtime PM callbacks may be executed concurrently with system
> > suspend/resume callbacks for the same device.
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> A quick question: is there some specific reason why this patch should
> not go into the 3.0.y stable releases?
> We are trying to produce
> a runtime PM system of product quality based on 3.0.y and we've
> already had to backport this patch ourselves to get things stable.
> We have also backported:
> PM: Introduce generic "noirq" callback routines for subsystems (v2)
> PM / Runtime: Update documentation of interactions with system sleep
> PM / Runtime: Add new helper function: pm_runtime_status_suspended()
> And now it seems to be sufficient to get this thing going.
Well, it isn't a simple fix and it changes the code's behavior quite
significantly, so I thought it might not be a good idea to risk problems
with -stable because of it. Perhaps let's see how it works out in 3.1
and backport it later if there are no problem reports related to it?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/