On 2011/11/03 20:03, Alan Cox<alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'd advise you to take a step back and think if this is really needed. As Alan pointed out, the really expensive resource here is already beingSure - I'm just not seeing that a whole separate cgroup for it is
appropriate or a good plan. Anyone doing real resource management needs
the rest of the stuff anyway.
Right. When I saw Frederic's controller today, my first thought was
that one could move the fork limit code over into that controller. If
we reach a consensus that this would be a good idea, and would have
chances to get merged, I could probably take some time to refactor my
code.
Max