Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] regulator: adapt fixed regulator driver to dt

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

> Shouldn't a fixed regulator just be a subset of a fixed one? If so, should the
> binding be merged with that one?

No, the fixed voltage regultor is a superset of a general regulator - it
has additional information like the voltage it supplies and the optional
enable GPIO.

> > +- regulator-fixed-enabled-at-boot: 1 = yes, 0 = no

> Same here, you can drop the prefix. Also, the regular regulators use
> "regulator-name" for the supply name, it would make sense to reuse the same
> naming here, right?

I'm having a hard time associating your second comment with the property
being discussed - could you clarify please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/