>Yeah, ok, but it shouldn't be part of the description of regulator>
>> properties per se. See how gpio does it, defining how a gpio-specifier
>> is crafted. The equivalent should be done for regulators.
> That seems to be pretty much exactly what's being done here, and like
> the GPIO bindings it's specified in the core document. Though perhaps
> there's some aspect of how the document is written that's missing.
Yep, sounds good. A slightly more elaborate description of the bindingOk, will add more elaborate documentation for this in the core
inspired by the gpio.txt document would be the way to do that.