Re: [PATCH v3] x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap'd addressis invalid

[Matthew Garrett]

On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:34:48PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:

> After the feedback from v1 I tried to unify the efi_ioremap()
> implementations but ran into the issue detailed in the RH bug report
> in the changelog. Unless we teach the x86 setup code that
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA regions should be part of the direct kernel
> mapping table (even though they're marked as E820_RESERVED) I think
> this patch makes the most sense.

Honestly it seems like there may well be an argument for that. We're 
talking about executable code that the kernel will be calling - it seems 
theoretically neater for it to be added to the direct mapping. We're 
just heavily constrained by our collapsing of the EFI memory map onto 
the rather less fine-grained E820 one and the lack of any obvious way to 
extend that in an OS-specific manner. I guess we could expect the 
bootloader to conform to the standard and then re-walk the EFI memory 
map ourselves to fix things up, but eww...

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/