Re: [F.A.Q.] perf ABI backwards and forwards compatibility

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:15 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> The one notable thing that isnt being tested in a natural way is the 
> 'group of events' abstraction - which, ironically, has been added on 
> the perfmon guys' insistence. No app beyond the PAPI self-test makes 
> actual use of it though, which results in an obvious lack of testing. 

Also the self monitor stuff, perf-tool doesn't use that for obvious
reasons.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/