Re: [PATCH] RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of somevariables

From: Jesper Nilsson
Date: Tue Nov 08 2011 - 11:34:52 EST


On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:45:46PM +0100, Claudio Scordino wrote:
> Subject: RS485: fix inconsistencies in the meaning of some variables
> From: Claudio Scordino <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The crisv10.c and the atmel_serial.c serial drivers intepret the fields of the
> serial_rs485 structure in a different way.
> In particular, crisv10.c uses SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND and
> SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND for the voltage of the RTS pin; atmel_serial.c, instead,
> uses these values to know if a delay must be set before and after sending.
> This patch makes the usage of these variables consistent across all drivers and
> fixes the Documentation as well.
> >From now on, SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND and SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND will be used to
> set the voltage of the RTS pin (as in the crisv10.c driver); the delay will be
> understood by looking only at the value of delay_rts_before_send and
> delay_rts_after_send.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Darron Black <darron@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
--
Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/