Re: [PATCHv6 01/19] usb: otg: Rename otg_transceiver to usb_phy

[Felipe Balbi]

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:28:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but sounds like you are still marrying
> > > > OTG with transceivers.
> > > I'm against the idea of usb_phy married with the transceiver (i.e
> > > transceiver = twl6030 for instance)
> > 
> > I think the source of confusion is the split phy functionality on OMAPs.
> > twl6030 basically provides VBUS/ID comparators which communicate VBUS/ID
> > levels to internal PHY via a well-defined mailbox. We need a
> > good way to write that down in source code.
> 
> OK, I think I understand now. So this issue is not in the scope of
> these patches, right?

probably not, still worth keeping it in mind ;-)

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature